Journal of Mechanical Design

companion website

FEATURED ARTICLES

ASSESSING QUALITY OF USER-SUBMITTED NEED STATEMENTS FROM LARGE-SCALE NEEDFINDING: EFFECTS OF EXPERTISE AND GROUP SIZE


11/13/2015Cory R. Schaffhausen and Timothy M. Kowalewski
J. Mech. Des 137(12), 121102 (2015); doi: 10.1115/1.4031655​

Collecting data on user needs can result in overwhelming amounts of data, especially if user groups are large and diverse. Additional analysis is necessary to prioritize a small subset of needs for further consideration. This study presents a simplified quality metric and online interface appropriate to initially screen and prioritize lists exceeding 500 statements for a single topic or product area. Over 20,000 ratings for 1697 need statements across three common product areas were collected in 6 days.  A series of analyses tested whether particular characteristics of users and groups affect the number of high-quality needs that can be generated.  The evaluated characteristics were user group size, needs submitted per person, and expertise and experience levels of users.  The results provided important quantitative evidence of fundamental relationships between the quantity and quality of need statements. Increased quantities of high-quality need statements resulted both due to increasing user group size and due to increasing counts per person using novel content-rich methods to help users articulate needs. However, a user’s topic-specific expertise (self-rated) and experience level (self-rated hours per week) were not significantly associated with increasing need quality.

ASSESSING QUALITY OF USER-SUBMITTED NEED STATEMENTS FROM LARGE-SCALE NEEDFINDING: EFFECTS OF EXPERTISE AND GROUP SIZE

For the Full Paper please see ASME’s Digital Collection.

SHARE: 

Featured Articles Subjects

Additive Manufacturing
Ancient design
Artificial Intelligence
Associate Editors
Awards
Bioinspired Design
Complex Engineered Systems
Compliant Mechanisms
Composites
Data Driven Design
Data Mining
Data-driven Design
Design Automation
Design Communities
Design Education
Design Fixation
Design Innovation
Design of Mechanisms and Robotic Systems
Design Optimization
Design Research
Design Theory
Design Theory And Methodology
Digital Twin
Direct Contact Mechanisms
Double-Blind Review Option
Dynamics
Editors' Choice Award
Energy
Engineered Materials And Structures
Ethics
Fluids
Gears
Generative Design
Guest Editorials
IDETC
Industry
Information Design
International Perspectives
JMD History
JMD Review Process
JMD Statistics
Kinematics
Leadership
Machine Learning
Manufacturing
Mechanisms
Mechanisms Robotics
Memoriam
Optimization
Origami
Orthotics
Piezoelectric Actuators
Power transmission gearing
Product Development
Robotics
Simulation-based Design
Smart Structures
Special Issues
Sustainable Design
System Design